Added local files from desktop at Bobst.

This commit is contained in:
Vicky Steeves 2016-05-26 13:36:47 -04:00
parent ff7da1bbe4
commit e70c4dbfb8
12 changed files with 3331 additions and 0 deletions

107
NDSR_Paper.aux Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
\relax
\providecommand\hyper@newdestlabel[2]{}
\providecommand\HyperFirstAtBeginDocument{\AtBeginDocument}
\HyperFirstAtBeginDocument{\ifx\hyper@anchor\@undefined
\global\let\oldcontentsline\contentsline
\gdef\contentsline#1#2#3#4{\oldcontentsline{#1}{#2}{#3}}
\global\let\oldnewlabel\newlabel
\gdef\newlabel#1#2{\newlabelxx{#1}#2}
\gdef\newlabelxx#1#2#3#4#5#6{\oldnewlabel{#1}{{#2}{#3}}}
\AtEndDocument{\ifx\hyper@anchor\@undefined
\let\contentsline\oldcontentsline
\let\newlabel\oldnewlabel
\fi}
\fi}
\global\let\hyper@last\relax
\gdef\HyperFirstAtBeginDocument#1{#1}
\providecommand\HyField@AuxAddToFields[1]{}
\providecommand\HyField@AuxAddToCoFields[2]{}
\citation{1}
\citation{2}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{\thepage }{section.1}}
\citation{3}
\citation{4}
\citation{5}
\citation{6,7,8}
\citation{9,10}
\citation{11}
\citation{12,13}
\citation{14}
\citation{15}
\citation{16}
\citation{17}
\citation{18}
\citation{19}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}About NDSR}{\thepage }{section.2}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Literature Review}{\thepage }{section.3}}
\citation{20,21}
\citation{22}
\citation{23}
\citation{24}
\citation{25}
\citation{26}
\citation{27}
\citation{28}
\citation{29}
\citation{30}
\citation{31}
\citation{32}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Research Methods}{\thepage }{section.4}}
\citation{33}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Code categories, their frequencies and sub-codes from the document analysis.\relax }}{\thepage }{table.caption.5}}
\providecommand*\caption@xref[2]{\@setref\relax\@undefined{#1}}
\newlabel{my-label}{{1}{\thepage }{Code categories, their frequencies and sub-codes from the document analysis.\relax }{table.caption.5}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Results}{\thepage }{section.5}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.1}Document Analysis}{\thepage }{subsection.5.1}}
\newlabel{Figure 1.}{{\caption@xref {Figure 1.}{ on input line 165}}{\thepage }{Research Methods}{figure.caption.6}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Total distribution of frequency of responses over code categories\relax }}{\thepage }{figure.caption.6}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.2}Survey Responses}{\thepage }{subsection.5.2}}
\newlabel{Figure 3.}{{\caption@xref {Figure 3.}{ on input line 201}}{\thepage }{Survey Responses}{figure.caption.7}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Modal average of code categories.\relax }}{\thepage }{figure.caption.7}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Responses per sub-code with descriptive statistics.\relax }}{\thepage }{table.caption.8}}
\newlabel{my-label}{{2}{\thepage }{Responses per sub-code with descriptive statistics.\relax }{table.caption.8}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {5.2.1}Technical Skills}{\thepage }{subsubsection.5.2.1}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.3}Optional Questions}{\thepage }{subsection.5.3}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {5.3.1}Quantitative}{\thepage }{subsubsection.5.3.1}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {5.3.2}Qualitative}{\thepage }{subsubsection.5.3.2}}
\newlabel{Figure 4.}{{\caption@xref {Figure 4.}{ on input line 256}}{\thepage }{Technical Skills}{figure.caption.9}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Breakdown of technical skills code category\relax }}{\thepage }{figure.caption.9}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Conclusions}{\thepage }{section.6}}
\bibstyle{unsrt}
\bibdata{biblio}
\bibcite{1}{1}
\bibcite{2}{2}
\bibcite{3}{3}
\bibcite{4}{4}
\bibcite{5}{5}
\bibcite{6}{6}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {7}Implications and Future Work}{\thepage }{section.7}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {8}Supplementary Materials}{\thepage }{section.8}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {9}References}{\thepage }{section.9}}
\bibcite{7}{7}
\bibcite{8}{8}
\bibcite{9}{9}
\bibcite{10}{10}
\bibcite{11}{11}
\bibcite{12}{12}
\bibcite{13}{13}
\bibcite{14}{14}
\bibcite{15}{15}
\bibcite{16}{16}
\bibcite{17}{17}
\bibcite{18}{18}
\bibcite{19}{19}
\bibcite{20}{20}
\bibcite{21}{21}
\bibcite{22}{22}
\bibcite{23}{23}
\bibcite{24}{24}
\bibcite{25}{25}
\bibcite{26}{26}
\bibcite{27}{27}
\bibcite{28}{28}
\bibcite{29}{29}
\bibcite{30}{30}
\bibcite{31}{31}
\bibcite{32}{32}
\bibcite{33}{33}

209
NDSR_Paper.bbl Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
\begin{thebibliography}{10}
\bibitem{1}
{National Digital Stewardship Alliance}.
\newblock {National} {Agenda} for {Digital} {Stewardship}.
\newblock September 2015.
\bibitem{2}
{Council on Library and Information Resources}.
\newblock {CLIR} {Receives} {IMLS} {Grant} to {Assess} {National} {Digital}
{Stewardship} {Residency} {Programs}.
\newblock
\url{http://web.archive.org/web/20160313223145/http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/documents/2015NationalAgenda.pdf},
September 2015.
\bibitem{3}
{Library of Congress}.
\newblock National {Digital} {Stewardship} {Residency}.
\newblock
\url{http://web.archive.org/web/20160404223713/http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/ndsr/},
{n.d.}
\bibitem{4}
{American Library Association}.
\newblock {ALA}'s {Core} {Competences} of {Librarianship}.
\newblock
\url{http://web.archive.org/web/20160304200942/http://www.ala.org/educationcareers/sites/ala.org.educationcareers/files/content/careers/corecomp/corecompetences/finalcorecompstat09.pdf},
2009.
\bibitem{5}
{American Library Association}.
\newblock Knowledge and competencies statements developed by relevant
professional organizations.
\newblock
\url{http://web.archive.org/web/20150830202610/http://www.ala.org/educationcareers/careers/corecomp/corecompspecial/knowledgecompetencies},
2015.
\bibitem{6}
W.M. Duff, A.~Marshall, C.~Limkilde, and M.~van Ballegooie.
\newblock Digital {Preservation} {Education}: {Educating} or {Networking}?
\newblock {\em The American Archivist}, 69(1):188--212, 2006.
\bibitem{7}
H.R. Tibbo.
\newblock So much to learn, so little time to learn it: {North} {American}
archival education programs in the information age and the role for
certificate programs.
\newblock {\em Archival Science}, 6:231--245, 2006.
\bibitem{8}
C.~Thomas and S.I. Patel.
\newblock Competency-based training: a viable strategy for an evolving
workforce?
\newblock {\em Journal of Education for Library and Information Science},
49(4):298--309, 2008.
\bibitem{9}
Y.~Choi and E.~Rasmussen.
\newblock What is needed to educate future digital librarians: a study of
current practice and staffing patterns in academic and research libraries.
\newblock {\em D-Lib Magazine}, 12(9), 2006.
\bibitem{10}
Cal Lee and Helen Tibbo.
\newblock Closing the {Digital} {Curation} {Gap} {Focus} {Groups} {Report},
June 2011.
\bibitem{11}
G.~Pryor and M.~Donnelly.
\newblock Skilling up to data: {Whose} role, whose responsibility, whose
career.
\newblock {\em International Journal of Digital Curation}, 2(4):158--170, 2009.
\bibitem{12}
Ragnar~Andreas Audunson and Nafiz~Zaman Shuva.
\newblock Digital {Library} {Education} in {Europe}.
\newblock {\em SAGE Open}, 6(1):2158244015622538, January 2016.
\bibitem{13}
M.~Madrid.
\newblock A study of digital curator competences: a survey of experts.
\newblock {\em International Information \& Library Review}, 45(3-4):149--156,
2013.
\bibitem{14}
Cal Lee.
\newblock Matrix of {Digital} {Curation} {Knowledge} and {Competencies}.
\newblock
\url{http://web.archive.org/web/20150929215051/http://www.ils.unc.edu/digccurr/digccurr-matrix.html},
2009.
\bibitem{15}
B.~Fulton, P.~Botticelli, and J.~Bradley.
\newblock {DigIn}: a hands-on approach to a digital curation curriculum for
professional development.
\newblock {\em Journal of Education for Library and Information Science},
52(2):95--109, 2011.
\bibitem{16}
{Digital Preservation Outreach and Education (DPOE)}.
\newblock {DPOE} training needs assessment survey, 2010.
\newblock http://web.archive.org/web/20160323170209.
\bibitem{17}
H.R. Tibbo.
\newblock Presidential {Address}: {On} the occasion of {SAA}'s diamond jubilee:
{A} professional coming of age in the digital era.
\newblock {\em American Archivist}, 75:17--34, 2012.
\bibitem{18}
{Society of American Archivists}.
\newblock {DAS} {Curriculum} {Structure}.
\newblock
\url{http://web.archive.org/web/20150828210835/http://www2.archivists.org/prof-education/das/curriculum-structure},
August 2015.
\bibitem{19}
J.~Kim, E.~Warga, and W.~Moen.
\newblock Digital curation in the academic library job market.
\newblock {\em Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology}, 49(1):1--4, 2012.
\bibitem{20}
P.~Chan.
\newblock What {Does} it {Take} to {Be} a {Well}-rounded {Digital} {Archivist}?
{\textbar} {The} {Signal}: {Digital} {Preservation}.
\newblock
\url{http://web.archive.org/web/20160301155958/http://blogs.loc.gov/digitalpreservation/2014/10/what-does-it-take-to-be-a-well-rounded-digital-archivist/},
October 2014.
\bibitem{21}
J.~Dooley.
\newblock What's in a digital archivist's skill set?
\newblock
\url{http://web.archive.org/web/20150925105555/http://hangingtogether.org/?p=3912},
June 2014.
\bibitem{22}
G.A. Bowen.
\newblock Document analysis as a qualitative research method.
\newblock {\em Qualitative Research Journal}, 9(2):27--40, 2009.
\bibitem{23}
{NDSR-NY}.
\newblock The {National} {Digital} {Stewardship} {Residency} in {New} {York}.
\newblock \url{http://ndsr.nycdigital.org/}, 2015.
\bibitem{24}
{NDSR-Boston}.
\newblock The {National} {Digital} {Stewardship} {Residency} {Boston},
{Massachusetts}.
\newblock \url{http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/ndsr_boston/home}, 2016.
\bibitem{25}
{NDSR}.
\newblock The {National} {Digital} {Stewardship} {Residency}.
\newblock \url{http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/ndsr/index.html}, 2015.
\bibitem{26}
{NDSR}.
\newblock The {National} {Digital} {Stewardship} {Residency}.
\newblock
\url{http://web.archive.org/web/20140801145633/http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/ndsr/index.html},
2014.
\bibitem{27}
{NDSR-Boston}.
\newblock The {National} {Digital} {Stewardship} {Residency} {Boston},
{Massachusetts}.
\newblock
\url{http://web.archive.org/web/20150320184022/http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/ndsr_boston/home},
2015.
\bibitem{28}
K.~Charmaz.
\newblock {\em Constructing {Grounded} {Theory}}.
\newblock SAGE Publications Inc, London, 2014.
\bibitem{29}
S.~Sarker, F.~Lau, and S.~Sahay.
\newblock Using an adapted grounded theory approach for inductive theory
building about virtual team development.
\newblock {\em Database for Advances in Information Systems}, 32(1):38--56,
2001.
\bibitem{30}
J.D. Orton.
\newblock From inductive to iterative grounded theory: {Zipping} the gap
between process theory and process data.
\newblock {\em Scandinavian Journal of Management}, 13(4):413--438, 1997.
\bibitem{31}
M.~Denscombe.
\newblock {\em The good research guide: for small-scale social research
projects}.
\newblock Open University Press, Maidenhead, 5. ed edition, 2014.
\bibitem{32}
M.~R. Sirkin.
\newblock {\em Statistics for the social sciences}.
\newblock Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif, 3rd ed edition, 2006.
\bibitem{33}
F.~J. Fowler.
\newblock {\em Survey research methods}.
\newblock Applied social research methods series. SAGE, Los Angeles, fifth
edition edition, 2014.
\end{thebibliography}

60
NDSR_Paper.blg Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
This is BibTeX, Version 0.99d (TeX Live 2013/Debian)
Capacity: max_strings=35307, hash_size=35307, hash_prime=30011
The top-level auxiliary file: NDSR_Paper.aux
The style file: unsrt.bst
Database file #1: biblio.bib
Warning--entry type for "5" isn't style-file defined
--line 41 of file biblio.bib
Warning--entry type for "23" isn't style-file defined
--line 235 of file biblio.bib
Warning--entry type for "24" isn't style-file defined
--line 244 of file biblio.bib
Warning--entry type for "25" isn't style-file defined
--line 251 of file biblio.bib
Warning--entry type for "26" isn't style-file defined
--line 258 of file biblio.bib
Warning--entry type for "27" isn't style-file defined
--line 265 of file biblio.bib
Warning--empty journal in 1
You've used 33 entries,
1791 wiz_defined-function locations,
612 strings with 8824 characters,
and the built_in function-call counts, 5710 in all, are:
= -- 524
> -- 183
< -- 0
+ -- 80
- -- 47
* -- 291
:= -- 904
add.period$ -- 99
call.type$ -- 33
change.case$ -- 32
chr.to.int$ -- 0
cite$ -- 34
duplicate$ -- 239
empty$ -- 660
format.name$ -- 47
if$ -- 1287
int.to.chr$ -- 0
int.to.str$ -- 33
missing$ -- 22
newline$ -- 167
num.names$ -- 33
pop$ -- 129
preamble$ -- 1
purify$ -- 0
quote$ -- 0
skip$ -- 101
stack$ -- 0
substring$ -- 290
swap$ -- 32
text.length$ -- 0
text.prefix$ -- 0
top$ -- 0
type$ -- 0
warning$ -- 1
while$ -- 56
width$ -- 35
write$ -- 350
(There were 7 warnings)

623
NDSR_Paper.log Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,623 @@
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.5-1.40.14 (TeX Live 2013/Debian) (format=pdflatex 2016.4.1) 24 APR 2016 20:00
entering extended mode
restricted \write18 enabled.
%&-line parsing enabled.
**NDSR_Paper.tex
(./NDSR_Paper.tex
LaTeX2e <2011/06/27>
Babel <3.9h> and hyphenation patterns for 4 languages loaded.
(./acm_proc_article-sp.cls
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/graphics/epsfig.sty
Package: epsfig 1999/02/16 v1.7a (e)psfig emulation (SPQR)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/graphics/graphicx.sty
Package: graphicx 1999/02/16 v1.0f Enhanced LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/graphics/keyval.sty
Package: keyval 1999/03/16 v1.13 key=value parser (DPC)
\KV@toks@=\toks14
)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/graphics/graphics.sty
Package: graphics 2009/02/05 v1.0o Standard LaTeX Graphics (DPC,SPQR)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/graphics/trig.sty
Package: trig 1999/03/16 v1.09 sin cos tan (DPC)
)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/latexconfig/graphics.cfg
File: graphics.cfg 2010/04/23 v1.9 graphics configuration of TeX Live
)
Package graphics Info: Driver file: pdftex.def on input line 91.
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/pdftex-def/pdftex.def
File: pdftex.def 2011/05/27 v0.06d Graphics/color for pdfTeX
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/oberdiek/infwarerr.sty
Package: infwarerr 2010/04/08 v1.3 Providing info/warning/error messages (HO)
)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/oberdiek/ltxcmds.sty
Package: ltxcmds 2011/11/09 v1.22 LaTeX kernel commands for general use (HO)
)
\Gread@gobject=\count79
))
\Gin@req@height=\dimen102
\Gin@req@width=\dimen103
)
\epsfxsize=\dimen104
\epsfysize=\dimen105
)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/amsfonts/amssymb.sty
Package: amssymb 2013/01/14 v3.01 AMS font symbols
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/amsfonts/amsfonts.sty
Package: amsfonts 2013/01/14 v3.01 Basic AMSFonts support
\@emptytoks=\toks15
\symAMSa=\mathgroup4
\symAMSb=\mathgroup5
LaTeX Font Info: Overwriting math alphabet `\mathfrak' in version `bold'
(Font) U/euf/m/n --> U/euf/b/n on input line 106.
))
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/amsmath/amsmath.sty
Package: amsmath 2013/01/14 v2.14 AMS math features
\@mathmargin=\skip41
For additional information on amsmath, use the `?' option.
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/amsmath/amstext.sty
Package: amstext 2000/06/29 v2.01
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/amsmath/amsgen.sty
File: amsgen.sty 1999/11/30 v2.0
\@emptytoks=\toks16
\ex@=\dimen106
))
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/amsmath/amsbsy.sty
Package: amsbsy 1999/11/29 v1.2d
\pmbraise@=\dimen107
)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/amsmath/amsopn.sty
Package: amsopn 1999/12/14 v2.01 operator names
)
\inf@bad=\count80
LaTeX Info: Redefining \frac on input line 210.
\uproot@=\count81
\leftroot@=\count82
LaTeX Info: Redefining \overline on input line 306.
\classnum@=\count83
\DOTSCASE@=\count84
LaTeX Info: Redefining \ldots on input line 378.
LaTeX Info: Redefining \dots on input line 381.
LaTeX Info: Redefining \cdots on input line 466.
\Mathstrutbox@=\box26
\strutbox@=\box27
\big@size=\dimen108
LaTeX Font Info: Redeclaring font encoding OML on input line 566.
LaTeX Font Info: Redeclaring font encoding OMS on input line 567.
\macc@depth=\count85
\c@MaxMatrixCols=\count86
\dotsspace@=\muskip10
\c@parentequation=\count87
\dspbrk@lvl=\count88
\tag@help=\toks17
\row@=\count89
\column@=\count90
\maxfields@=\count91
\andhelp@=\toks18
\eqnshift@=\dimen109
\alignsep@=\dimen110
\tagshift@=\dimen111
\tagwidth@=\dimen112
\totwidth@=\dimen113
\lineht@=\dimen114
\@envbody=\toks19
\multlinegap=\skip42
\multlinetaggap=\skip43
\mathdisplay@stack=\toks20
LaTeX Info: Redefining \[ on input line 2665.
LaTeX Info: Redefining \] on input line 2666.
)
Document Class 'acm_proc_article-sp' <22nd. April '09>. Modified by G.K.M. Tobi
n
Based in part upon document Style `acmconf' <22 May 89>. Hacked 4/91 by
shivers@cs.cmu.edu, 4/93 by theobald@cs.mcgill.ca
Excerpts were taken from (Journal Style) 'esub2acm.cls'.
****** Bugs/comments/suggestions to Gerry Murray -- murray@hq.acm.org ******
\footheight=\dimen115
\@maxsep=\dimen116
\@dblmaxsep=\dimen117
\aucount=\count92
\originalaucount=\count93
\auwidth=\dimen118
\auskip=\dimen119
\auskipcount=\count94
\auskip=\dimen120
\allauboxes=\dimen121
\addauthors=\toks21
\addauflag=\count95
\subtitletext=\toks22
\savesection=\count96
\sectioncntr=\count97
\c@figure=\count98
\c@table=\count99
\titleboxnotes=\toks23
\titleboxnoteflag=\count100
Document Class: acm_proc_article-sp 2009/04/22 - V3.2SP - based on esub2acm.sty
<23 April 96>
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/latexsym.sty
Package: latexsym 1998/08/17 v2.2e Standard LaTeX package (lasy symbols)
\symlasy=\mathgroup6
LaTeX Font Info: Overwriting symbol font `lasy' in version `bold'
(Font) U/lasy/m/n --> U/lasy/b/n on input line 47.
)
\@acmtitlebox=\box28
\titlenotecount=\count101
\tntoks=\toks24
\tntokstwo=\toks25
\tntoksthree=\toks26
\tntoksfour=\toks27
\tntoksfive=\toks28
\catcount=\count102
\copyrightnotice=\toks29
\conf=\toks30
\confinfo=\toks31
\c@part=\count103
\c@section=\count104
\c@subsection=\count105
\c@subsubsection=\count106
\c@paragraph=\count107
Using 'Abbrev' bibliography style
LaTeX Info: Redefining \cite on input line 1236.
\bibindent=\dimen122
\colcntr=\count108
\saveb@x=\box29
\copyrtyr=\toks32
\acmcopyr=\toks33
\boilerplate=\toks34
\copyrightetc=\toks35
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/fontenc.sty
Package: fontenc 2005/09/27 v1.99g Standard LaTeX package
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/t1enc.def
File: t1enc.def 2005/09/27 v1.99g Standard LaTeX file
LaTeX Font Info: Redeclaring font encoding T1 on input line 43.
)
LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for T1+aer on input line 100.
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/ae/t1aer.fd
File: t1aer.fd 1997/11/16 Font definitions for T1/aer.
)))
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/caption/caption.sty
Package: caption 2013/05/02 v3.3-89 Customizing captions (AR)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/caption/caption3.sty
Package: caption3 2013/05/02 v1.6-88 caption3 kernel (AR)
Package caption3 Info: TeX engine: e-TeX on input line 57.
\captionmargin=\dimen123
\captionmargin@=\dimen124
\captionwidth=\dimen125
\caption@tempdima=\dimen126
\caption@indent=\dimen127
\caption@parindent=\dimen128
\caption@hangindent=\dimen129
\abovecaptionskip=\skip44
\belowcaptionskip=\skip45
Package caption Info: Unknown document class (or package),
(caption) standard defaults will be used.
)
Package caption Warning: Unsupported document class (or package) detected,
(caption) usage of the caption package is not recommended.
See the caption package documentation for explanation.
Package caption Info: \@makecaption = \long macro:#1#2-> \vskip \baselineskip \
setbox \@tempboxa \hbox {\textbf {#1: #2}} \ifdim \wd \@tempboxa >\hsize \textb
f {#1: #2}\par \else \hbox to\hsize {\hfil \box \@tempboxa \hfil }\par \fi .
\c@ContinuedFloat=\count109
) (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/float/float.sty
Package: float 2001/11/08 v1.3d Float enhancements (AL)
\c@float@type=\count110
\float@exts=\toks36
\float@box=\box30
\@float@everytoks=\toks37
\@floatcapt=\box31
)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/multirow/multirow.sty
\bigstrutjot=\dimen130
)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/cite/cite.sty
LaTeX Info: Redefining \cite on input line 302.
LaTeX Info: Redefining \nocite on input line 373.
Package: cite 2010/09/10 v 5.3
)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/url/url.sty
\Urlmuskip=\muskip11
Package: url 2013/09/16 ver 3.4 Verb mode for urls, etc.
)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/hyperref/hyperref.sty
Package: hyperref 2012/11/06 v6.83m Hypertext links for LaTeX
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/oberdiek/hobsub-hyperref.sty
Package: hobsub-hyperref 2012/05/28 v1.13 Bundle oberdiek, subset hyperref (HO)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/oberdiek/hobsub-generic.sty
Package: hobsub-generic 2012/05/28 v1.13 Bundle oberdiek, subset generic (HO)
Package: hobsub 2012/05/28 v1.13 Construct package bundles (HO)
Package hobsub Info: Skipping package `infwarerr' (already loaded).
Package hobsub Info: Skipping package `ltxcmds' (already loaded).
Package: ifluatex 2010/03/01 v1.3 Provides the ifluatex switch (HO)
Package ifluatex Info: LuaTeX not detected.
Package: ifvtex 2010/03/01 v1.5 Detect VTeX and its facilities (HO)
Package ifvtex Info: VTeX not detected.
Package: intcalc 2007/09/27 v1.1 Expandable calculations with integers (HO)
Package: ifpdf 2011/01/30 v2.3 Provides the ifpdf switch (HO)
Package ifpdf Info: pdfTeX in PDF mode is detected.
Package: etexcmds 2011/02/16 v1.5 Avoid name clashes with e-TeX commands (HO)
Package etexcmds Info: Could not find \expanded.
(etexcmds) That can mean that you are not using pdfTeX 1.50 or
(etexcmds) that some package has redefined \expanded.
(etexcmds) In the latter case, load this package earlier.
Package: kvsetkeys 2012/04/25 v1.16 Key value parser (HO)
Package: kvdefinekeys 2011/04/07 v1.3 Define keys (HO)
Package: pdftexcmds 2011/11/29 v0.20 Utility functions of pdfTeX for LuaTeX (HO
)
Package pdftexcmds Info: LuaTeX not detected.
Package pdftexcmds Info: \pdf@primitive is available.
Package pdftexcmds Info: \pdf@ifprimitive is available.
Package pdftexcmds Info: \pdfdraftmode found.
Package: pdfescape 2011/11/25 v1.13 Implements pdfTeX's escape features (HO)
Package: bigintcalc 2012/04/08 v1.3 Expandable calculations on big integers (HO
)
Package: bitset 2011/01/30 v1.1 Handle bit-vector datatype (HO)
Package: uniquecounter 2011/01/30 v1.2 Provide unlimited unique counter (HO)
)
Package hobsub Info: Skipping package `hobsub' (already loaded).
Package: letltxmacro 2010/09/02 v1.4 Let assignment for LaTeX macros (HO)
Package: hopatch 2012/05/28 v1.2 Wrapper for package hooks (HO)
Package: xcolor-patch 2011/01/30 xcolor patch
Package: atveryend 2011/06/30 v1.8 Hooks at the very end of document (HO)
Package atveryend Info: \enddocument detected (standard20110627).
Package: atbegshi 2011/10/05 v1.16 At begin shipout hook (HO)
Package: refcount 2011/10/16 v3.4 Data extraction from label references (HO)
Package: hycolor 2011/01/30 v1.7 Color options for hyperref/bookmark (HO)
)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/ifxetex/ifxetex.sty
Package: ifxetex 2010/09/12 v0.6 Provides ifxetex conditional
)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/oberdiek/auxhook.sty
Package: auxhook 2011/03/04 v1.3 Hooks for auxiliary files (HO)
)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/oberdiek/kvoptions.sty
Package: kvoptions 2011/06/30 v3.11 Key value format for package options (HO)
)
\@linkdim=\dimen131
\Hy@linkcounter=\count111
\Hy@pagecounter=\count112
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/hyperref/pd1enc.def
File: pd1enc.def 2012/11/06 v6.83m Hyperref: PDFDocEncoding definition (HO)
)
\Hy@SavedSpaceFactor=\count113
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/latexconfig/hyperref.cfg
File: hyperref.cfg 2002/06/06 v1.2 hyperref configuration of TeXLive
)
Package hyperref Info: Hyper figures OFF on input line 4443.
Package hyperref Info: Link nesting OFF on input line 4448.
Package hyperref Info: Hyper index ON on input line 4451.
Package hyperref Info: Plain pages OFF on input line 4458.
Package hyperref Info: Backreferencing OFF on input line 4463.
Package hyperref Info: Implicit mode ON; LaTeX internals redefined.
Package hyperref Info: Bookmarks ON on input line 4688.
\c@Hy@tempcnt=\count114
LaTeX Info: Redefining \url on input line 5041.
\XeTeXLinkMargin=\dimen132
\Fld@menulength=\count115
\Field@Width=\dimen133
\Fld@charsize=\dimen134
Package hyperref Info: Hyper figures OFF on input line 6295.
Package hyperref Info: Link nesting OFF on input line 6300.
Package hyperref Info: Hyper index ON on input line 6303.
Package hyperref Info: backreferencing OFF on input line 6310.
Package hyperref Info: Link coloring OFF on input line 6315.
Package hyperref Info: Link coloring with OCG OFF on input line 6320.
Package hyperref Info: PDF/A mode OFF on input line 6325.
LaTeX Info: Redefining \ref on input line 6365.
LaTeX Info: Redefining \pageref on input line 6369.
Package hyperref Warning: Option `pdfpagelabels' is turned off
(hyperref) because \thepage is undefined.
\c@Item=\count116
\c@Hfootnote=\count117
)
Package hyperref Message: Driver (autodetected): hpdftex.
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/hyperref/hpdftex.def
File: hpdftex.def 2012/11/06 v6.83m Hyperref driver for pdfTeX
\Fld@listcount=\count118
\c@bookmark@seq@number=\count119
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/oberdiek/rerunfilecheck.sty
Package: rerunfilecheck 2011/04/15 v1.7 Rerun checks for auxiliary files (HO)
Package uniquecounter Info: New unique counter `rerunfilecheck' on input line 2
82.
)
\Hy@SectionHShift=\skip46
)
(./NDSR_Paper.aux
LaTeX Warning: Label `my-label' multiply defined.
)
\openout1 = `NDSR_Paper.aux'.
LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OML/cmm/m/it on input line 37.
LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 37.
LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for T1/cmr/m/n on input line 37.
LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 37.
LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OT1/cmr/m/n on input line 37.
LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 37.
LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OMS/cmsy/m/n on input line 37.
LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 37.
LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for OMX/cmex/m/n on input line 37.
LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 37.
LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for U/cmr/m/n on input line 37.
LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 37.
LaTeX Font Info: Checking defaults for PD1/pdf/m/n on input line 37.
LaTeX Font Info: ... okay on input line 37.
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/context/base/supp-pdf.mkii
[Loading MPS to PDF converter (version 2006.09.02).]
\scratchcounter=\count120
\scratchdimen=\dimen135
\scratchbox=\box32
\nofMPsegments=\count121
\nofMParguments=\count122
\everyMPshowfont=\toks38
\MPscratchCnt=\count123
\MPscratchDim=\dimen136
\MPnumerator=\count124
\makeMPintoPDFobject=\count125
\everyMPtoPDFconversion=\toks39
) (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/oberdiek/epstopdf-base.sty
Package: epstopdf-base 2010/02/09 v2.5 Base part for package epstopdf
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/oberdiek/grfext.sty
Package: grfext 2010/08/19 v1.1 Manage graphics extensions (HO)
)
Package grfext Info: Graphics extension search list:
(grfext) [.png,.pdf,.jpg,.mps,.jpeg,.jbig2,.jb2,.PNG,.PDF,.JPG,.JPE
G,.JBIG2,.JB2,.eps]
(grfext) \AppendGraphicsExtensions on input line 452.
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/latexconfig/epstopdf-sys.cfg
File: epstopdf-sys.cfg 2010/07/13 v1.3 Configuration of (r)epstopdf for TeX Liv
e
))
Package caption Info: Begin \AtBeginDocument code.
Package caption Info: float package is loaded.
Package caption Info: hyperref package is loaded.
Package caption Info: End \AtBeginDocument code.
\AtBeginShipoutBox=\box33
Package hyperref Warning: Height of page (\paperheight) is invalid (0.0pt),
(hyperref) using 11in.
Package hyperref Info: Link coloring OFF on input line 37.
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/hyperref/nameref.sty
Package: nameref 2012/10/27 v2.43 Cross-referencing by name of section
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/oberdiek/gettitlestring.sty
Package: gettitlestring 2010/12/03 v1.4 Cleanup title references (HO)
)
\c@section@level=\count126
)
LaTeX Info: Redefining \ref on input line 37.
LaTeX Info: Redefining \pageref on input line 37.
LaTeX Info: Redefining \nameref on input line 37.
(./NDSR_Paper.out) (./NDSR_Paper.out)
\@outlinefile=\write3
\openout3 = `NDSR_Paper.out'.
LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for U+msa on input line 79.
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/amsfonts/umsa.fd
File: umsa.fd 2013/01/14 v3.01 AMS symbols A
)
LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for U+msb on input line 79.
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/amsfonts/umsb.fd
File: umsb.fd 2013/01/14 v3.01 AMS symbols B
)
LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for U+lasy on input line 79.
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/ulasy.fd
File: ulasy.fd 1998/08/17 v2.2e LaTeX symbol font definitions
) [1{/var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map}
]
Overfull \hbox (2.89407pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 106--107
\T1/aer/m/n/9 learn-ing ex-pec-ta-tions, and man-age-ment prin-ci-ples and ethi
cs,
[]
pdfTeX warning (ext4): destination with the same identifier (name{page.}) has b
een already used, duplicate ignored
<to be read again>
\relax
l.113
[2] <total_skills.png, id=132, 1055.945pt x 618.31pt>
File: total_skills.png Graphic file (type png)
<use total_skills.png>
Package pdftex.def Info: total_skills.png used on input line 164.
(pdftex.def) Requested size: 527.9712pt x 309.15424pt.
Overfull \hbox (23.9712pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 164--166
[][]
[]
Overfull \hbox (3.08493pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 169--170
\T1/aer/m/n/9 The au-thors used a so-cial sci-ence re-search method-ol-ogy call
ed
[]
Underfull \hbox (badness 10000) in paragraph at lines 171--171
[][][]\T1/aer/m/n/9 Produced by QSR In-ter-na-tional:
[]
pdfTeX warning (ext4): destination with the same identifier (name{page.}) has b
een already used, duplicate ignored
<to be read again>
\relax
l.182
[3]
Overfull \hbox (1.96916pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 185--186
[]\T1/aer/m/n/9 The au-thors' fi-nal con-cern was with send-ing in-di-vid-ual e
mails
[]
Overfull \hbox (7.27028pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 185--186
\T1/aer/m/n/9 to par-tic-i-pants. This de-mys-ti-fied some of the ini-tial anon
ymity
[]
Underfull \vbox (badness 10000) has occurred while \output is active []
pdfTeX warning (ext4): destination with the same identifier (name{page.}) has b
een already used, duplicate ignored
<to be read again>
\relax
l.192
[4]
Overfull \hbox (2.41951pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 193--194
\T1/aer/m/n/9 func-tions emerged from the anal-y-sis: \T1/aer/m/it/9 Tech-ni-ca
l skills\T1/aer/m/n/9 ; \T1/aer/m/it/9 Knowl-
[]
<modal_average.png, id=168, 475.7775pt x 637.38126pt>
File: modal_average.png Graphic file (type png)
<use modal_average.png>
Package pdftex.def Info: modal_average.png used on input line 200.
(pdftex.def) Requested size: 190.30762pt x 254.94798pt.
LaTeX Warning: Text page \thepage contains only floats.
Underfull \vbox (badness 1062) has occurred while \output is active []
pdfTeX warning (ext4): destination with the same identifier (name{page.}) has b
een already used, duplicate ignored
<to be read again>
\relax
l.247
[5 <./total_skills.png> <./modal_average.png>]
<tech_skills.png, id=177, 1079.03125pt x 546.04pt>
File: tech_skills.png Graphic file (type png)
<use tech_skills.png>
Package pdftex.def Info: tech_skills.png used on input line 255.
(pdftex.def) Requested size: 539.51431pt x 273.01933pt.
Overfull \hbox (35.51431pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 255--257
[][]
[]
pdfTeX warning (ext4): destination with the same identifier (name{page.}) has b
een already used, duplicate ignored
<to be read again>
\relax
l.272
[6]
Overfull \hbox (1.21022pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 274--275
\T1/aer/m/n/9 re-search op-por-tu-ni-ties, com-mu-ni-ca-tion skills, and
[]
pdfTeX warning (ext4): destination with the same identifier (name{page.}) has b
een already used, duplicate ignored
<to be read again>
\relax
l.288
[7 <./tech_skills.png>]
Overfull \hbox (2.42035pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 292--293
\T1/aer/m/n/9 stew-ard-ship work. These are: \T1/aer/m/it/9 For-mat mi-gra-tion
/transcoding\T1/aer/m/n/9 ,
[]
Overfull \hbox (5.07228pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 292--293
\T1/aer/m/it/9 Repos-i-tory man-age-ment\T1/aer/m/n/9 , \T1/aer/m/it/9 Meta-dat
a doc-u-men-ta-tion\T1/aer/m/n/9 , and \T1/aer/m/it/9 Schol-
[]
(./NDSR_Paper.bbl
LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for T1+aett on input line 13.
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/ae/t1aett.fd
File: t1aett.fd 1997/11/16 Font definitions for T1/aett.
)pdfTeX warning (ext4): destination with the same identifier (name{page.}) has
been already used, duplicate ignored
<to be read again>
\relax
l.43 \bibitem{7}
[8]
Overfull \hbox (55.23648pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 124--130
\T1/aett/m/n/9 what-[]does-[]it-[]take-[]to-[]be-[]a-[]well-[]rounded-[]digital
-[]archivist/$[]\T1/aer/m/n/9 ,
[]
Underfull \vbox (badness 10000) has occurred while \output is active []
)
Package atveryend Info: Empty hook `BeforeClearDocument' on input line 308.
pdfTeX warning (ext4): destination with the same identifier (name{page.}) has b
een already used, duplicate ignored
<to be read again>
\relax
l.308 \end{document}
[9]
Package atveryend Info: Empty hook `AfterLastShipout' on input line 308.
(./NDSR_Paper.aux)
Package atveryend Info: Empty hook `AtVeryEndDocument' on input line 308.
Package atveryend Info: Executing hook `AtEndAfterFileList' on input line 308.
Package rerunfilecheck Info: File `NDSR_Paper.out' has not changed.
(rerunfilecheck) Checksum: C78297315BA4D31E1C478D3BAAA795C3;869.
LaTeX Warning: There were multiply-defined labels.
Package atveryend Info: Empty hook `AtVeryVeryEnd' on input line 308.
)
Here is how much of TeX's memory you used:
7602 strings out of 494985
110586 string characters out of 6180357
210485 words of memory out of 5000000
10634 multiletter control sequences out of 15000+600000
52246 words of font info for 71 fonts, out of 8000000 for 9000
36 hyphenation exceptions out of 8191
41i,14n,38p,1504b,426s stack positions out of 5000i,500n,10000p,200000b,80000s
{/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/enc/dvips/base/8r.enc}</usr/share/texliv
e/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmbx9.pfb></usr/share/texlive/texmf
-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmr6.pfb></usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fo
nts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmr9.pfb></usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type
1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmsy9.pfb></usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/publi
c/amsfonts/cm/cmti9.pfb></usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfo
nts/cm/cmtt9.pfb></usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/urw/helvetic/uhvb8a
.pfb></usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/urw/helvetic/uhvr8a.pfb></usr/s
hare/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/urw/times/utmb8a.pfb></usr/share/texlive/te
xmf-dist/fonts/type1/urw/times/utmri8a.pfb>
Output written on NDSR_Paper.pdf (9 pages, 269596 bytes).
PDF statistics:
285 PDF objects out of 1000 (max. 8388607)
255 compressed objects within 3 object streams
65 named destinations out of 1000 (max. 500000)
136 words of extra memory for PDF output out of 10000 (max. 10000000)

15
NDSR_Paper.out Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.1}{Introduction}{}% 1
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.2}{About NDSR}{}% 2
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.3}{Literature Review}{}% 3
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.4}{Research Methods}{}% 4
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.5}{Results}{}% 5
\BOOKMARK [2][-]{subsection.5.1}{Document Analysis}{section.5}% 6
\BOOKMARK [2][-]{subsection.5.2}{Survey Responses}{section.5}% 7
\BOOKMARK [3][-]{subsubsection.5.2.1}{Technical Skills}{subsection.5.2}% 8
\BOOKMARK [2][-]{subsection.5.3}{Optional Questions}{section.5}% 9
\BOOKMARK [3][-]{subsubsection.5.3.1}{Quantitative}{subsection.5.3}% 10
\BOOKMARK [3][-]{subsubsection.5.3.2}{Qualitative}{subsection.5.3}% 11
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.6}{Conclusions}{}% 12
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.7}{Implications and Future Work}{}% 13
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.8}{Supplementary Materials}{}% 14
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.9}{References}{}% 15

BIN
NDSR_Paper.pdf Normal file

Binary file not shown.

308
NDSR_Paper.tex Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,308 @@
% THIS IS SIGPROC-SP.TEX - VERSION 3.1
% WORKS WITH V3.2SP OF ACM_PROC_ARTICLE-SP.CLS
% APRIL 2009
%
% It is an example file showing how to use the 'acm_proc_article-sp.cls' V3.2SP
% LaTeX2e document class file for Conference Proceedings submissions.
% ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% This .tex file (and associated .cls V3.2SP) *DOES NOT* produce:
% 1) The Permission Statement
% 2) The Conference (location) Info information
% 3) The Copyright Line with ACM data
% 4) Page numbering
% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% It is an example which *does* use the .bib file (from which the .bbl file
% is produced).
% REMEMBER HOWEVER: After having produced the .bbl file,
% and prior to final submission,
% you need to 'insert' your .bbl file into your source .tex file so as to provide
% ONE 'self-contained' source file.
%
% Questions regarding SIGS should be sent to
% Adrienne Griscti ---> griscti@acm.org
%
% Questions/suggestions regarding the guidelines, .tex and .cls files, etc. to
% Gerald Murray ---> murray@hq.acm.org
%
% For tracking purposes - this is V3.1SP - APRIL 2009
\documentclass{acm_proc_article-sp}
\usepackage{caption}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{float}
\usepackage{multirow}
\usepackage{cite}
\usepackage{url}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\begin{document}
\title{What makes a digital steward:}
\subtitle{A competency profile based on the National Digital Stewardship Residencies}
\author{
\begin{tabular}{c}
% 1st. author
Karl-Rainer Blumenthal\\
\affaddr{Internet Archive}\\
\email{karlb@archive.org}
\end{tabular}%
\begin{tabular}{c}
% 2nd. author
Peggy Griesinger\\
\affaddr{George Mason University}\\
\email{mgriesin@gmu.edu}
\end{tabular} \\[10pt]\\
\begin{tabular}{c}
% 3rd. author
Julia Kim\\
\affaddr{Library of Congress}\\
\email{juliakim@loc.gov}
\end{tabular}
\begin{tabular}{c}
% 4th. author
Shira Peltzman\\
\affaddr{University of California, Los Angeles}\\
\email{speltzman@library.ucla.edu}
\end{tabular}
\begin{tabular}{c}
% 5th. author
Vicky Steeves\\
\affaddr{New York University}\\
\email{victoria.steeves@nyu.edu}
\end{tabular}
}
\date{25 April 2016}
\maketitle
\begin{abstract}
Digital stewardship is the active and long-term management of digital objects towards their preservation for and unencumbered access by future generations. Although the field is rapidly maturing, it still lacks a comprehensive competency profile for practitioners. This is due in part to the relative youth of the field, and to the fact that being an effective steward of digital materials requires highly specialized training that is best acquired through hands-on work. Given the key role that competency profiles play in the design of curricula and job postings, the lack of one hinders the training and education of professionals for these positions. This paper provides a profile of the skills, responsibilities, and knowledge areas that define competency in digital stewardship, based on a close study of the projects undertaken in the National Digital Stewardship Residency program (NDSR). The authors use a triangulated research methodology in order to define the scope of the profile, qualitatively analyze the competencies articulated among NDSR project descriptions, and quantitatively evaluate those competencies' importance to professional success. The profile that results from this research has implications for current and future digital stewards: training designed with this profile as its basis will focus on the skills most needed to be an effective digital steward, and therefore can guide both graduate and professional development curricula alike.
\end{abstract}
% A category with the (minimum) three required fields
\category{H.4}{Information Systems}{General}
\category{K.3.2}{Computer and Information Science Education}{Information systems education}
\keywords{digital stewardship, National Digital Stewardship Residency, NDSR, education, training, digital preservation} % NOT required for Proceedings
\section{Introduction}
Although digital preservation is a young field, there are now more scholarship, tools, and resources that address the long-term stewardship\footnote{For the purposes of this paper, "digital stewardship" is defined as the active and long-term management of digital objects towards their robust preservation for and unencumbered access by future generations, inclusive of all subfields of labor and expertise previously defined among professional surveys and studies as digital curation, data curation, data management, digital archiving, digital preservation, and digitization. Digital stewards include data librarians, digital asset managers, digital archivists, and all manner of administrators who seek to align disparate digitization and digital preservation efforts.} of digital material than ever before. In recent years there has been a notable expansion of educational and training resources in particular, including workshops, symposia, conferences, and professional development curricula. However, as the 2015 National Agenda for Digital Stewardship asserts, "[g]enuine interest and motivation to learn about a subject cannot be taught in a workshop or training session; similarly, knowledge about standards and practices in an evolving field is best gained through direct, practical experience."\cite{1} In short, being an effective steward of digital material requires more extensive and specialized training than can be acquired through traditional means.
What, then, makes a digital steward? Despite the acknowledgment that stewards must possess a particular skillset, there has not yet been sufficient scholarship performed to identify a competency profile for digital stewards, as exist in other professional communities. A competency profile succinctly articulates the specific skills, responsibilities, and knowledge areas required to practice in one's profession, and is therefore instrumental to setting training and education goals. Perhaps it is due to the field's relative youth that so many analyses of it have focused principally on the surrounding literature--most commonly surveys of graduate school curricula or job advertisements--rather than on the backgrounds and training of practitioners themselves. But as the amount of digital material entering libraries, archives, and museums worldwide continues to grow, developing successful training goals for the next generation of stewards is an increasingly vital pursuit.
The lack of any cogent competency profile for this field is significant because competency profiles are used in the creation of job ads and curriculum development, which in turn affects how the field and its practitioners succeed in and improve their profession. In spite of this, the Agenda singles out the National Digital Stewardship Residency (NDSR hereafter) as an especially successful training model due to the fact that it allows recent graduates to gain practical, hands-on experience in the field managing digital stewardship projects. Although measuring the long-term impact of this program on the field at large would be premature\footnote{Although it is not a longitudinal analysis, the Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR) is at the time of writing conducting a cross-cohort assessment of the entire NDSR program in order to evaluate the significance of the residency experience for the residents and their host institutions, and to identify common success factors across the various residencies.\cite{2}}, the project descriptions created by host institutions for both current and former residents yield valuable information. Both the wide variety of projects and activities covered as well as the fact that they explicitly outline goals and responsibilities for each individual resident and project makes them ideal for determining the skillset and expertise required to successfully perform the professional duties of a digital steward.
The authors developed a competency profile for digital stewards by using a three-pronged approach: 1) reviewing literature on the topics of emerging digital stewardship roles, responsibilities, expected practices, and training needs; 2) qualitatively analyzing current and completed NDSR project descriptions; and 3) quantitatively analyzing the results from a survey conducted of former and current Residents that identified the range and types of competencies required to successfully complete each project. The result is a profile of the skills, responsibilities, and knowledge areas that define competency in digital stewardship, which will create a clearer understanding of the on-the-job skills required of digital stewardship professionals in the hopes of informing future professional and curricula development in the field.
\section{About NDSR}
NDSR was created by the Library of Congress, in partnership with the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), with the mission to "build a dedicated community of professionals who will advance our nation's capabilities in managing, preserving, and making accessible the digital record of human achievement."\cite{3} In its pilot year (2013-2014) NDSR matched ten recent graduates with mentors at ten cultural heritage institutions in order to develop, apply, and advance emerging digital stewardship practices and their own knowledge and skills in real-world settings. Since then, IMLS has granted funding to five additional NDSR programs among cultural heritage organizations throughout the country.
The program involves competitive selection processes for both host institutions and residents. Host institutions are selected on the basis of criteria such as their ability to provide higher-level support and mentorship to residents, as well as the significance of their proposed projects. These projects can be as broad in scope as institutional assessments and policy writing, or as narrow as documenting the particular application of a software within a larger workflow. Applicants must be U.S. citizens or able to work in the U.S., as well as recent graduates of post-baccalaureate degrees.
Although residents' salaries are paid through IMLS grant funds, they are regarded as regular employees by their host institutions and measures are taken to ensure that they are incorporated into the fabric of their institutions' workplaces. This is balanced by the fact that the residency is an apprenticeship program in which an important criteria for success is learning outcomes and job placement within the field after its completion. Each NDSR program supplements on-site support with workshops and trainings designed to foster professional growth. Residents are also strongly encouraged to publicize their projects through presentations and conference participation.
\section{Literature Review}
Competency profiles are a common way for information management professions to express educational and/or professional benchmarks. These include foundational professional concepts, information resources, research standards, lifelong learning expectations, and management principles and ethics, among other things. The American Library Association's "Core Competencies of Librarianship," for instance, establishes a baseline for those things that every "person graduating from an ALA-accredited master's program in library and information studies should know and, where appropriate, be able to employ."\cite{4} At least 16 affiliated or closely related professional organizations have adopted similar statements. \cite{5}
Studies of training needs and efficacy \cite{6, 7, 8} cite the lack of a commonly accepted profile for digital stewardship as confounding to efforts to design complementary curricula. Alternative approaches in the U.S.,\cite{9, 10}, U.K.\cite{11}, and internationally\cite{12, 13} survey professionals actively working in digital stewardship roles to identify their core competencies in order to broadly identify gaps and opportunities in the training and education of current and future professionals. Efforts continue to develop rigorous digital stewardship curricula among select ALA-accredited programs in library and information science. They range from exhaustively deductive matrices of technical proficiencies\cite{14} to inductive and fieldwork-based practicum programs.\cite{15}
Studies both external\cite{16} and internal\cite{17} to the Society of American Archivists (SAA) were instrumental to the creation of that organization's Digital Archives Specialist (DAS) Curriculum and its corresponding certification program, which at the time of writing provides the archival profession's most succinct, widely disseminated, and professionally supported profile of the "core competencies" for digital archivists\cite{18}. Digital stewards outside of the archives domain would benefit from similarly rigorous research and output.
The logic for identifying competency indicators differs across the above efforts, but the authors took especial interest in the methodology chosen for the \textit{Information: Curate, Archive, Manage, Preserve} (iCAMP) curriculum development project, which reduces the language of data management job advertisements to summaries of the job titles, experience requirements, and knowledge and skill expectations that they contain\cite{19}. The results are too specific to the data management domain and generalized in their language to answer this paper's questions regarding digital stewardship writ large. However, they provide a useful precedent for the application of qualitative data analysis tools to perform comparable document analysis on a corpus of residency project descriptions that the authors believe are both more broad in their professional scope and specific in their language.
Less rigorous, more impromptu investigations\cite{20, 21} also mine the corpus of job advertisements for language articulating the specific competencies desired by information organizations hiring digital archivists. These inquiries provide useful insight into the emerging lexicon of digital archives, but leave open to question how many of these articulated competencies and skills are the core responsibilities for their hires, and towards which future professionals must train.
The literature review reveals an opportunity to provide digital stewards with an overarching competency profile and statement that span various specializations within the field, but which also articulate requirements concretely enough to guide graduate and professional education and training goals.
\begin{table*}[t!]
\begin{tabular}{lll}
\textbf{Code category} & \textbf{Frequency} & \textbf{Sub-Codes} \\
Technical skills & 397 & Format migration/transcoding \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{\multirow{9}{*}{}} & Metadata \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{} & Workflow enhancement/development \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{} & Audio/video \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{} & Digital asset management \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{} & Digitization \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{} & Coding/scripting \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{} & Implementation of hardware/software \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{} & Web archiving \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{} & Qualitative and data analysis skills \\
Professional output responsibilities & 275 & Metadata crosswalk/guidelines \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{\multirow{4}{*}{}} & Report/recommendations \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{} & Survey/inventory \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{} & Teaching materials/toolkits \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{} & Scholarly output \\
Communication skills & 148 & Presentation \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{\multirow{5}{*}{}} & Written output \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{} & Workshop/training \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{} & Interact/liaise with internal staff/stakeholders \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{} & Interact/liaise with external stakeholders \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{} & Public outreach \\
Research responsibilities & 118 & Literature review \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{\multirow{2}{*}{}} & Survey of standards/best practices \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{} & Environmental scan \\
Project management abilities & 92 & Managing resources \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{} & Managing people \\
Knowledge of standards and best practices & 62 & Metadata \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{\multirow{2}{*}{}} & Data management \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{} & Repository management \\
Personality requirements & 30 & Attention to detail \\
& & Flexible \\
& & Enthusiastic
\end{tabular}
\caption{Code categories, their frequencies and sub-codes from the document analysis.}
\label{my-label}
\end{table*}
The authors used a triangulated approach to create a profile of digital stewardship competencies. The literature review provided an initial sample of commonly used summary terminology for skills, knowledge areas, and responsibilities typically applied in practice. This informed the authors' distillation of 35 NDSR project descriptions through document analysis\footnote{Document analysis is a systematic procedure for analyzing and interpreting data generated from documents; in qualitative research, document analysis is often used to corroborate findings from other data sources such as surveys, interviews, etc.\cite{22}}, the results of which provided the authors the precise terminology with which to construct a survey instrument.
Project descriptions for both New York residency cohorts\cite{23} and the most recent cohorts in both Boston\cite{24} and Washington, D.C.\cite{25} were retrieved from each cohort's official website. Project descriptions for the initial Boston\cite{26} and Washington, D.C.\cite{27} residency cohorts were retrieved from the archived instances of those cohorts' official websites made available through the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine.
\section{Research Methods}
\begin{figure*}[!t]
\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{total_skills.png}
\label{Figure 1.}
\caption{Total distribution of frequency of responses over code categories}
\end{figure*}
The authors used a social science research methodology called grounded theory\cite{28} to analyze the qualitative data (project descriptions). Research using grounded theory begins with a collection of qualitative data that the researcher then reviews and re-reviews. During this process, the researcher tags specific quotes, words, or phrases as evidence, and assigns them "codes" that represent larger ideas.\cite{29} As data is iteratively reviewed, these codes can be grouped into concepts and ultimately categories, which become the basis for a new thesis or theory. This differs from traditional qualitative methodology because it creates its theoretical framework inductively, rather than relying upon an existing one.\cite{30}
The authors used this method to code for attributes expected of each resident. The authors used NVivo\footnote{Produced by QSR International: http://www.qsrinternational.com/product}, a proprietary qualitative data analysis software designed for researchers working with data that requires deep levels of analysis, in order to perform document analysis. NVivo was chosen because of its real-time version control, which was useful because the research team was geographically distributed. Two of the authors performed an initial blind review of the materials, using a predetermined codebook\footnote{A codebook describes and defines the codes for which the authors searched.} based on an initial sampling of the dataset and the literature review.
Although the document analysis could provide the authors with a baseline understanding of the attributes that the residents were intended to develop, the authors also sought to examine how the projects had been borne out in practice. To accomplish this, the authors designed and implemented an online survey of current and past residents. By comparing the findings of the document analysis and the survey, the authors could assign quantitative weight to any similarities, differences, or unanticipated but necessary competencies.
The overarching code categories became the question blocks and the sub-codes became the corresponding rating matrix of individual questions within the survey instrument (see Supplementary Materials). The authors chose to exclude \textit{Personality requirements} (see Table 1) from the survey because these are general traits common to job advertisements across professions, rather than specific to digital stewardship.
The authors used Qualtrics\footnote{Produced by Qualtrics: https://www.qualtrics.com/}, a proprietary research software used to enable online data collection through building survey instruments, because it was readily available via an institutional license, randomized question order, and anonymized participants down to the IP address.
Initially, four survey invitations were sent to the list of participants using the Qualtrics email function, or "mailer." The mailer allows for complete anonymity in the data collection: the authors could not see who had completed or not completed the survey. This also allowed the authors to send out individualized, anonymous links, to separate respondents in bulk. When the survey was scheduled to close, there were still nine participants of the original thirty-five who did not partake. To get as close to a full dataset as possible, each author sent a follow-up email to four-to-seven participants. The link to the survey included in these emails was still anonymous and did not record IP, but was no longer unique to each recipient.
The authors acknowledge several methodological issues with the data collection for this study. The first is that the authors are included in the dataset as participants. The most significant issue is that the authors effectively studied themselves; they designed, tested, and discussed the survey before deployment. As a result, they did not take the survey blind. Not only did this differentiate them from the rest of the participants, which could potentially skew the data, but it also introduced the potential for nonresponse bias\cite{31}. However, the authors randomized the questions to mitigate the latter issue. Although the authors recognize that participating in their own research is unorthodox, they felt that it was essential to equally represent all of the different NDSR projects, locations, and cohorts in the survey results. Were they to have recused themselves from the study, it would have been impossible to achieve the generally accepted statistical minimum of 35\cite{32}. Moreover, because the authors all belonged to the same 2014-15 NDSR in New York cohort, those projects would not have been represented in the survey results. The authors felt that the benefits of including their responses outweighed the potential costs of excluding their responses from the dataset.
Another potential problem was the fact that fifteen of the participants took the survey before they completed their residencies. This introduced a possibility for survey bias \cite{33}. They might not have been able to answer the optional questions regarding 1) post-NDSR job functions, and 2) additional skills necessary to complete their residencies. However, since the current residents could answer all the required questions (they were more than halfway through their residencies during data collection), they were still included in the participant population.
The authors' final concern was with sending individual emails to participants. This demystified some of the initial anonymity afforded by using the Qualtrics mailer. Some participants replied to these individualized emails, indicating they had already taken the survey (some even providing the date), or that they had not taken part but would do so shortly. The authors promptly deleted these emails permanently, and no records remain. Given the already small sample size, the authors felt that having as close to a complete dataset as possible was so impactful to the results that the follow ups were necessary.
\section{Results}
This study had two main outputs: the results of the document analysis (qualitative), and the results of the survey (quantitative). Through examining both, the authors could create a matrix of the competency areas vital to the National Digital Stewardship Residencies.
\subsection{Document Analysis}
Two of the authors coded the project descriptions. In order to compare their interpretations of the data, the authors used the NVivo "coding comparison" feature to determine that they had a 90\% agreement rate on the codes, and then met to reconcile the 10\% of cases in which their coding differed. The seven resulting high-level code categories represent the overall categories of competencies required to perform as a digital steward. These were informed by terminology from the literature review and the initial sampling of the qualitative dataset.
Seven coded categories of competence in residency-related functions emerged from the analysis: \textit{Technical skills}; \textit{Knowledge of standards and best practices}; \textit{Research responsibilities}; \textit{Communication skills}; \textit{Project management abilities}; \textit{Professional output responsibilities}; and \textit{Personality requirements}. The authors iteratively reviewed the qualitative data in order to identify sub-codes that more specifically represent the competency areas applied in the performance of the residencies. The minimum number of sub-codes per category was two, within \textit{Project management abilities}, and the maximum was ten, within \textit{Technical skills} (see Table 1).
Due in part to their extensive range of skills, \textit{Technical skills} has the highest frequency of appearances in the data (397). The second-highest is \textit{Professional output responsibilities} (275). \textit{Personality requirements} appear the least, at 30 in total.
\subsection{Survey Responses}
\begin{figure}[b!]
\centering
\includegraphics[keepaspectratio, scale=0.4]{modal_average.png}
\label{Figure 3.}
\caption{Modal average of code categories.}
\end{figure}
\begin{table*}[t!]
\centering
\resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{%
\begin{tabular}{llllllll}
& & \multicolumn{5}{l}{\textbf{Response Counts}} & \\
\textbf{Code Category} & \textbf{Sub-Code} & \textbf{1} & \textbf{2} & \textbf{3} & \textbf{4} & \textbf{5} & \textbf{Mode} \\
Technical skills & Format migration/transcoding & 10 & 6 & 10 & 4 & 3 & 1,3 \\
& Metadata creation and manipulation & 5 & 5 & 5 & 7 & 11 & 5 \\
& Workflow enhancement/development & 1 & 1 & 3 & 7 & 21 & 5 \\
& A/V preservation & 14 & 6 & 3 & 2 & 8 & 1 \\
& Digital asset management & 2 & 3 & 5 & 8 & 15 & 5 \\
& Digitization & 11 & 8 & 5 & 5 & 4 & 1 \\
& Coding/scripting & 10 & 10 & 6 & 4 & 3 & 1,2 \\
& Hardware/software implementation & 6 & 7 & 7 & 7 & 6 & 3 \\
& Web archiving & 18 & 7 & 3 & 1 & 4 & 1 \\
& Qualitative data analysis & 7 & 8 & 3 & 7 & 8 & 2,5 \\
Professional output responsibilities & Metadata documentation & 6 & 4 & 7 & 9 & 7 & 3,5 \\
& Reports/recommendations & 0 & 3 & 0 & 2 & 28 & 5 \\
& Surveys and/or inventories & 1 & 9 & 8 & 7 & 8 & 2 \\
& Teaching materials/toolkits & 7 & 7 & 10 & 3 & 6 & 3 \\
& Scholarly output (ie. annotated bibliographies, white papers, etc.) & 10 & 4 & 10 & 6 & 3 & 1,3 \\
Communication skills & Presentations (webinars, conferences, in-person stakeholder meetings, etc.) & 1 & 2 & 6 & 9 & 15 & 5 \\
& Written output (blog posts, journal articles, etc.) & 2 & 1 & 14 & 9 & 7 & 3 \\
& Workshops and trainings & 3 & 8 & 9 & 7 & 6 & 3 \\
& Internal Interactions & 0 & 0 & 1 & 8 & 24 & 5 \\
& External Interactions & 4 & 5 & 6 & 8 & 10 & 5 \\
& Public Outreach (social media, public events, etc.) & 9 & 9 & 6 & 6 & 3 & 1,2 \\
Research responsibilities & Literature reviews & 6 & 7 & 9 & 5 & 6 & 3 \\
& Surveys of best practices and standards & 0 & 5 & 4 & 7 & 17 & 5 \\
& Environmental scans (e.g. reviewing practices at peer institutions) & 1 & 3 & 2 & 11 & 16 & 5 \\
& Needs assessment/gap analysis & 1 & 1 & 5 & 10 & 16 & 5 \\
Project management abilities & Managing project resources (ie. workflows, tools, documentation, etc.) & 2 & 2 & 2 & 9 & 18 & 5 \\
& Managing people (ie. vendor relations, intern/staff supervision, etc.) & 2 & 6 & 9 & 6 & 10 & 5 \\
Knowledge of standards and best practices & Metadata & 1 & 5 & 5 & 14 & 8 & 4 \\
& Data management & 4 & 5 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 5 \\
& Repository management (TRAC, TRD, OAIS, etc.) & 1 & 7 & 9 & 7 & 9 & 3,5
\end{tabular}%
}
\caption{Responses per sub-code with descriptive statistics.}
\label{my-label}
\end{table*}
The survey was open from March 14 to April 1, 2016. Each of the six code categories had one required question, which took the form of a rating matrix (see Supplementary Materials). Each sub-code (see Table 1) represented a row of the matrix, and participants were asked to rank competencies on a five-point Likert scale from "Not at all important" (1) to "Essential" (5) (matrix columns). The survey had a 94\% response rate, having received 33 participant responses out of a total group of 35. The authors analyzed the frequency of responses in each code block in order to determine what the most impactful categories and individual competencies were to achieving residency goals.
Respondents identified "Essential" competencies frequently throughout the code categories. In four of the six categories, more sub-codes were deemed "Essential" than they were deemed any other level of importance, and in each case by a margin of at least seven responses. \textit{Technical skills} had a higher combined frequency of responses for "Not at all important" and "Occasionally important" than it did for "Very important" and "Essential," which drove down its overall importance rating. Only three more respondents deemed \textit{Knowledge of standards and best practices} "Very important" than those who deemed it "Essential."
The category of \textit{Technical skills} had the lowest average importance of the six codes, and \textit{Professional output responsibilities} had the second-lowest. The other four codes were all deemed "Essential" on average by the participants (see Figure 3).
\subsubsection{Technical Skills}
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[keepaspectratio, scale=0.5]{tech_skills.png}
\label{Figure 4.}
\caption{Breakdown of technical skills code category}
\end{figure*}
Perhaps the most striking aspect of the data was the \textit{Technical skills} category. \textit{Technical skills} had the most mixed results of any category in the survey, which could be due in part to the fact that it had the highest number of granular competency areas (sub-codes). The result was a clear disparity in the distribution of responses per importance level. The outlier in \textit{Technical skills} with the lowest importance rating was \textit{Web archiving}, which drove down the overall importance found in Figure 3. \textit{Workflow enhancement} was also an outlier; it was rated as the most essential technical skill by a margin of seven responses.
\subsection{Optional Questions}
After answering the required questions above, survey respondents were invited to answer three optional questions.
\subsubsection{Quantitative}
An optional question in the survey asked the participants whether or not their experience in NDSR was relevant to their current employment. Every participant answered this question, with 90\% (30 participants) saying yes, while 10\% (3 participants) answered no.
\subsubsection{Qualitative}
The last two questions in the survey were open-ended questions that asked participants for feedback in longer-form writing. The first question asked participants to identify any competencies not addressed in the survey. 11 of 33 (33\%) of respondents answered this question. The authors could not ascribe any particular pattern to these responses, however several of them further described a competency or competencies from the survey as applied to their specific project. The second question asked for any additional feedback or comments. 6 of 33 (18\%) answered the second question. These answers were not analyzed using the qualitative methods above due to the low frequency and disparate topics covered, some of which again answered the previous optional question.
\section{Conclusions}
Learning from the competency areas that were described in the NDSR projects and identified by residents as being especially important (i.e. achieving a surveyed modal average of 4 [Very important] or 5 [Essential]), a competency statement representing this profile could read as follows:
\begin{quote}
Effective digital stewards leverage their technical skills, knowledge of standards and best practices, research opportunities, communication skills, and project management abilities to ensure the long-term viability of the digital record.
In order to accomplish this, they cultivate their skill developing and enhancing new and existing digital media workflows, managing digital assets, and creating and manipulating these assets' metadata. They commit to the successful implementation of these new workflows, standards, and best practices by reliably managing both project resources and people.
They maximize the impact of their professional practice by soliciting regular input from stakeholders both internal and external to their institutional setting. They articulate and document the standards and practices that address these needs by creating policies, professional recommendations, and reports, which requires that they maintain current and and expert knowledge of standards and best practices for metadata and data management in their respective sectors.
To keep current and anticipate needs as they develop in these and other areas important to their field and their stakeholders, they conduct professional research in the forms of environmental scans, needs assessments and gap analyses, and surveys of emerging standards and best practices.
Digital stewards are qualified to manage, preserve, and provide access to various new and/or challenging forms of media. They may also engage in, among other things: coding and scripting; digitization; hardware and software implementation; public outreach; and special media format management and migration.
\end{quote}
The authors conclude that while there are some fundamental competencies required of digital stewards, digital stewardship also encompasses niche skills that are role-specific. Several \textit{Technical skills} were far more important to some projects than to others, and therefore could be considered specialized, rather than fundamental skills. There was a clear bimodal distribution for \textit{Technical skills} (sub-codes in this category were deemed "Not at all important" 84 times and "Essential" 85 times). The authors posit that while job postings often list \textit{Technical skills} as being essential, this study indicates that they are not always essential to all jobs in practice.
These split distributions apply to \textit{Technical skills} sub-codes as well. For example, respondents were evenly split when gauging the importance of both \textit{Hardware/software implementation} and \textit{Qualitative data analysis}. These skills were unambiguously important to half of the respondents, but it unambiguously unimportant to the other half. \textit{Web archiving} distinguishes itself in this regard as a particularly niche skill--"Essential" to four respondents, but "Not important at all" to eighteen. By contrast, \textit{Workflow enhancement} is a universally important skill, having been deemed "Essential" twenty-one times and "Not important at all" only once.
By analyzing the project descriptions of the National Digital Stewardship Residencies, the authors enumerated the competency areas that define digital stewardship across a broad swath of applications. By surveying the residents responsible for successfully completing these residencies, they were also able to highlight fundamental competency areas that therefore belong in any profile of an effective digital steward.
\section{Implications and Future Work}
While the majority of competencies (sub-codes) surveyed for this study were definitively fundamental (had a mode $\geq$ 4) or specialized (had a mode of $\leq$ 2), there were thirteen that could not be as conclusively categorized. Of these, there were five that had a mode of 3, meaning the majority of the participants labeled these as "Somewhat important." These are: \textit{Hardware/software implementation}, \textit{Written output}, \textit{Workshops and trainings}, \textit{Teaching materials/toolkits}, and \textit{Literature review}. Seven sub-codes had multiple modes, showing disagreement among the participants as to the relevance of the skill for successfully completing their digital stewardship work. These are: \textit{Format migration/transcoding}, \textit{Coding/scripting}, \textit{Qualitative data analysis}, \textit{Public outreach}, \textit{Repository management}, \textit{Metadata documentation}, and \textit{Scholarly output}. The authors refrained from assigning these sub-codes into either the "Fundamental" or the "Specialized" tiers. The authors included them in this study's resulting competency statement as examples of further and increasingly specialized areas of work for which digital stewards are qualified, however, determining the place that these specific thirteen sub-codes hold in the overall profile of competencies for digital stewards presents an opportunity for future research.
It is important to note that this study's qualitative analysis was based on descriptions of projects, all of which were inherently time-limited and some of which were deliberately narrow in focus. While it was beyond the scope of this study, the diversity of project types among NDSR cohorts may also have affected the results. The specificity of certain projects, coupled with the fact that they were all designed to be accomplished in a relatively short time-frame, may have impacted our results to some degree--perhaps enough so to merit a new study that is based on a different set of data. However, the 90\% affirmation among this study's survey respondents implies that these competencies extend to digital stewardship positions beyond NDSR. The authors encourage using a similarly triangulated methodology to analyze competency areas found among permanent position descriptions and their incumbents. In particular, a follow-up study of those who have completed National Digital Stewardship Residencies and are now in permanent digital stewardship positions could do so while counterbalancing any possible bias of this study towards competencies that apply disproportionately to short-term appointments.
Finally, it is worth noting the fact that all residencies took place in the U.S.A., and consequently that this research is not international in scope. This presents an important area for future research, which might involve conducting a comparable study built on job descriptions culled from a variety of national contexts. Contrasting the results of such a study with the competency profile presented here would perhaps enable the construction of a stronger and more well-rounded profile overall.
This research has implications for current and future digital stewards alike: The resulting profile can be used to guide graduate and professional development curricula, and training designed with this profile as its basis will focus on the skills most needed to be an effective digital steward. For instance, this study suggests that although specific technical skills are viewed as highly important in different settings, a much larger majority of projects required skills less bound to a particular technology or media, like documentation creation and workflow analysis. The high level of agreement regarding the importance of writing reports and communicating internally also bolster a need for digital stewards to not only possess a deep understanding of their field, but to effectively disseminate their work to others. This new profile illustrates the fundamental competencies that must be cultivated by digital stewards in order to succeed in the profession.
\section{Supplementary Materials}
The authors welcome and encourage others to extend and reproduce their study, and have made all research materials, including the survey instrument and data, freely available at the following: https://osf.io/xfc26
\bibliographystyle{unsrt}
\bibliography{biblio}
%\balancecolumns
\end{document}

1670
acm_proc_article-sp.cls Normal file

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

339
biblio.bib Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,339 @@
@article{1,
title = {{National} {Agenda} for {Digital} {Stewardship}},
howpublished = "\url{http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/documents/2015NationalAgenda.pdf}",
language = {English},
author = {{National Digital Stewardship Alliance}},
month = sep,
year = {2015},
file = {2015NationalAgenda.pdf:/home/vicky/.zotero/zotero/ryt3s4a6.default/zotero/storage/3KWPHRIT/2015NationalAgenda.pdf:application/pdf}
}
@misc{2,
title = {{CLIR} {Receives} {IMLS} {Grant} to {Assess} {National} {Digital} {Stewardship} {Residency} {Programs}},
howpublished = "\url{http://web.archive.org/web/20160313223145/http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/documents/2015NationalAgenda.pdf}",
urldate = {2016-04-23},
author = {{Council on Library and Information Resources}},
month = sep,
year = {2015},
file = {CLIR Receives IMLS Grant to Assess National Digital Stewardship Residency Programs — Council on Library and Information Resources:/home/vicky/.zotero/zotero/ryt3s4a6.default/zotero/storage/8J3EI73B/NDSR.html:text/html}
}
@misc{3,
title = {National {Digital} {Stewardship} {Residency}},
howpublished = "\url{http://web.archive.org/web/20160404223713/http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/ndsr/}",
urldate = {2016-04-23},
journal = {Digital Preservation},
author = {{Library of Congress}},
year = {{n.d.}},
file = {NDSR - Digital Preservation (Library of Congress):/home/vicky/.zotero/zotero/ryt3s4a6.default/zotero/storage/5BV6HERZ/ndsr.html:text/html}
}
@misc{4,
title = {{ALA}'s {Core} {Competences} of {Librarianship}},
howpublished = "\url{http://web.archive.org/web/20160304200942/http://www.ala.org/educationcareers/sites/ala.org.educationcareers/files/content/careers/corecomp/corecompetences/finalcorecompstat09.pdf}",
language = {English},
urldate = {2016-04-23},
author = {{American Library Association}},
year = {2009},
file = {finalcorecompstat09.pdf:/home/vicky/.zotero/zotero/ryt3s4a6.default/zotero/storage/Q9NJXATU/finalcorecompstat09.pdf:application/pdf}
}
@online{5,
title = {Knowledge and competencies statements developed by relevant professional organizations},
howpublished = "\url{http://web.archive.org/web/20150830202610/http://www.ala.org/educationcareers/careers/corecomp/corecompspecial/knowledgecompetencies}",
urldate = {2016-04-23},
year = {2015},
author = {{American Library Association}},
file = {Knowledge and competencies statements developed by relevant professional organizations | Education & Careers:/home/vicky/.zotero/zotero/ryt3s4a6.default/zotero/storage/BJ4ZHF7P/knowledgecompetencies.html:text/html}
}
@article{6,
title = {Digital {Preservation} {Education}: {Educating} or {Networking}?},
volume = {69},
number = {1},
journal = {The American Archivist},
author = {Duff, W.M. and Marshall, A. and Limkilde, C. and van Ballegooie, M.},
year = {2006},
pages = {188--212}
}
@article{7,
title = {So much to learn, so little time to learn it: {North} {American} archival education programs in the information age and the role for certificate programs},
volume = {6},
journal = {Archival Science},
author = {Tibbo, H.R.},
year = {2006},
pages = {231--245}
}
@article{8,
title = {Competency-based training: a viable strategy for an evolving workforce?},
volume = {49},
number = {4},
journal = {Journal of Education for Library and Information Science},
author = {Thomas, C. and Patel, S.I.},
year = {2008},
pages = {298--309}
}
@article{9,
title = {What is needed to educate future digital librarians: a study of current practice and staffing patterns in academic and research libraries},
volume = {12},
number = {9},
journal = {D-Lib Magazine},
author = {Choi, Y. and Rasmussen, E.},
year = {2006}
}
@misc{10,
title = {Closing the {Digital} {Curation} {Gap} {Focus} {Groups} {Report}},
url = {http://web.archive.org/web/20160406043126/http://digitalcurationexchange.org/cdcg/sites/default/files/CDCG_FocusGroupReport.pdf},
language = {English},
urldate = {2016-04-23},
author = {Lee, Cal and Tibbo, Helen},
month = jun,
year = {2011},
file = {CDCG_FocusGroupReport.pdf:/home/vicky/.zotero/zotero/ryt3s4a6.default/zotero/storage/GAX96XDB/CDCG_FocusGroupReport.pdf:application/pdf}
}
@article{11,
title = {Skilling up to data: {Whose} role, whose responsibility, whose career},
volume = {2},
number = {4},
year = {2009},
journal = {International Journal of Digital Curation},
author = {Pryor, G. and Donnelly, M.},
pages = {158--170}
}
@article{12,
title = {Digital {Library} {Education} in {Europe}},
volume = {6},
copyright = {© The Author(s) 2016. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).},
issn = {2158-2440},
howpublished = "\url{http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/6/1/2158244015622538}",
doi = {10.1177/2158244015622538},
abstract = {Research in digital libraries (DLs) has gained much interest across the globe. Most funding related to DL are available for building DLs, rather than producing digital librarians by developing the DL curricula and offering necessary funding to introduce state-of-the-art DL labs for future library professionals. Based on online surveys, this article investigates the status of DL education/courses in Europe, particularly, it examines the curriculum contents of DL courses, explores the future direction of library and information science (LIS) curricula, and identifies the competitors of LIS schools in the DL world. This study received responses from 54 LIS schools/departments in 27 European countries. The results of the current study clearly show that the majority of the LIS schools have already integrated digital librarianship in their regular bachelor's and master's degree programs. The importance of practical aspects in DL curricula has been highlighted by the authors. The study also reports the recommended books and journals on DL, direction of LIS curricula, and the competitors of LIS schools in the digital world. A number of future research directions have been offered by the authors. The authors expect that the study will contribute to the discussions and debates toward identifying subject elements for DL courses. The top subject areas based on their importance as reported by the participants of the current study should be taken into consideration before designing curricula for DLs and before developing a Europe-wide unique LIS curriculum.},
language = {en},
number = {1},
urldate = {2016-04-23},
journal = {SAGE Open},
author = {Audunson, Ragnar Andreas and Shuva, Nafiz Zaman},
month = jan,
year = {2016},
pages = {2158244015622538},
file = {Full Text PDF:/home/vicky/.zotero/zotero/ryt3s4a6.default/zotero/storage/FXG3EUNM/Audunson and Shuva - 2016 - Digital Library Education in Europe.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:/home/vicky/.zotero/zotero/ryt3s4a6.default/zotero/storage/Z934U5R2/2158244015622538.html:text/html}
}
@article{13,
title = {A study of digital curator competences: a survey of experts},
volume = {45},
number = {3-4},
journal = {International Information \& Library Review},
author = {Madrid, M.},
year = {2013},
pages = {149--156}
}
@misc{14,
title = {Matrix of {Digital} {Curation} {Knowledge} and {Competencies}},
copyright = {Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike 3.0 License},
howpublished = "\url{http://web.archive.org/web/20150929215051/http://www.ils.unc.edu/digccurr/digccurr-matrix.html}",
urldate = {2016-04-23},
journal = {DigCCurr},
author = {Lee, Cal},
year = {2009},
file = {Matrix of Digital Curation Knowledge and Competencies (Overview) - DigCCurr Project:/home/vicky/.zotero/zotero/ryt3s4a6.default/zotero/storage/GIICUMRA/digccurr-matrix.html:text/html}
}
@article{15,
title = {{DigIn}: a hands-on approach to a digital curation curriculum for professional development},
volume = {52},
number = {2},
journal = {Journal of Education for Library and Information Science},
author = {Fulton, B. and Botticelli, P. and Bradley, J.},
year = {2011},
pages = {95--109}
}
@misc{16,
title = {{DPOE} training needs assessment survey},
url = {http://web.archive.org/web/20160323170209/http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/education/background.html},
urldate = {2016-04-23},
author = {{Digital Preservation Outreach and Education (DPOE)}},
year = {2010},
note = {http://web.archive.org/web/20160323170209},
file = {DPOE - Digital Preservation (Library of Congress):/home/vicky/.zotero/zotero/ryt3s4a6.default/zotero/storage/KPPXDT8J/background.html:text/html}
}
@article{17,
title = {Presidential {Address}: {On} the occasion of {SAA}'s diamond jubilee: {A} professional coming of age in the digital era},
volume = {75},
journal = {American Archivist},
author = {Tibbo, H.R.},
year = {2012},
pages = {17--34}
}
@misc{18,
title = {{DAS} {Curriculum} {Structure}},
howpublished = "\url{http://web.archive.org/web/20150828210835/http://www2.archivists.org/prof-education/das/curriculum-structure}",
urldate = {2016-04-23},
author = {{Society of American Archivists}},
month = aug,
year = {2015},
file = {DAS Curriculum Structure | Society of American Archivists:/home/vicky/.zotero/zotero/ryt3s4a6.default/zotero/storage/B7A9HX5S/curriculum-structure.html:text/html}
}
@article{19,
title = {Digital curation in the academic library job market},
volume = {49},
number = {1},
journal = {Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology},
author = {Kim, J. and Warga, E. and Moen, W.},
year = {2012},
pages = {1--4}
}
@misc{20,
title = {What {Does} it {Take} to {Be} a {Well}-rounded {Digital} {Archivist}? {\textbar} {The} {Signal}: {Digital} {Preservation}},
howpublished = "\url{http://web.archive.org/web/20160301155958/http://blogs.loc.gov/digitalpreservation/2014/10/what-does-it-take-to-be-a-well-rounded-digital-archivist/}",
language = {English},
urldate = {2016-04-23},
journal = {The Signal},
author = {Chan, P.},
month = oct,
year = {2014},
file = {What Does it Take to Be a Well-rounded Digital Archivist? | The Signal\: Digital Preservation:/home/vicky/.zotero/zotero/ryt3s4a6.default/zotero/storage/IDEFEC88/what-does-it-take-to-be-a-well-rounded-digital-archivist.html:text/html}
}
@misc{21,
title = {What's in a digital archivist's skill set?},
howpublished = "\url{http://web.archive.org/web/20150925105555/http://hangingtogether.org/?p=3912}",
language = {English},
urldate = {2016-04-23},
journal = {Hangingtogether.org: From OCLC Research},
author = {Dooley, J.},
month = jun,
year = {2014},
file = {What's in a digital archivist's skill set? | hangingtogether.org:/home/vicky/.zotero/zotero/ryt3s4a6.default/zotero/storage/HFI3QDPA/hangingtogether.html:text/html}
}
@article{22,
title = {Document analysis as a qualitative research method},
volume = {9},
issn = {1443-9883},
howpublished = "\url{http://dx.doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027}",
language = {English},
number = {2},
journal = {Qualitative Research Journal},
author = {Bowen, G.A.},
year = {2009},
pages = {27--40}
}
@online{23,
title = {The {National} {Digital} {Stewardship} {Residency} in {New} {York}},
author = {{NDSR-NY}},
howpublished = "\url{http://ndsr.nycdigital.org/}",
urldate = {2016-04-23},
year = {2015},
file = {Snapshot:/home/vicky/.zotero/zotero/ryt3s4a6.default/zotero/storage/G8QA92CP/ndsr.nycdigital.org.html:text/html}
}
@online{24,
title = {The {National} {Digital} {Stewardship} {Residency} {Boston}, {Massachusetts}},
author = {{NDSR-Boston}},
howpublished = "\url{http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/ndsr_boston/home}",
year = {2016}
}
@online{25,
title = {The {National} {Digital} {Stewardship} {Residency}},
author = {{NDSR}},
howpublished = "\url{http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/ndsr/index.html}",
year = {2015}
}
@online{26,
title = {The {National} {Digital} {Stewardship} {Residency}},
howpublished = "\url{http://web.archive.org/web/20140801145633/http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/ndsr/index.html}",
author = {{NDSR}},
year = {2014}
}
@online{27,
title = {The {National} {Digital} {Stewardship} {Residency} {Boston}, {Massachusetts}},
howpublished = "\url{http://web.archive.org/web/20150320184022/http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/ndsr_boston/home}",
author = {{NDSR-Boston}},
year = {2015}
}
@book{28,
address = {London},
title = {Constructing {Grounded} {Theory}},
isbn = {0-85702-914-2},
howpublished = "\url{https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/constructing-grounded-theory/book235960}",
language = {English},
urldate = {2016-04-23},
publisher = {SAGE Publications Inc},
author = {Charmaz, K.},
year = {2014},
file = {Constructing Grounded Theory | SAGE Publications Inc:/home/vicky/.zotero/zotero/ryt3s4a6.default/zotero/storage/BMK5MPF3/book235960.html:text/html}
}
@article{29,
title = {Using an adapted grounded theory approach for inductive theory building about virtual team development},
volume = {32},
number = {1},
journal = {Database for Advances in Information Systems},
author = {Sarker, S. and Lau, F. and Sahay, S.},
year = {2001},
pages = {38--56}
}
@article{30,
title = {From inductive to iterative grounded theory: {Zipping} the gap between process theory and process data},
volume = {13},
number = {4},
journal = {Scandinavian Journal of Management},
author = {Orton, J.D.},
year = {1997},
pages = {413--438}
}
@book{31,
address = {Maidenhead},
edition = {5. ed},
title = {The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects},
isbn = {978-0-335-26470-4},
shorttitle = {The good research guide},
language = {eng},
publisher = {Open University Press},
author = {Denscombe, M.},
year = {2014},
keywords = {Social sciences Research}
}
@book{32,
address = {Thousand Oaks, Calif},
edition = {3rd ed},
title = {Statistics for the social sciences},
isbn = {978-1-4129-0546-6},
publisher = {Sage Publications},
author = {Sirkin, M. R.},
year = {2006},
keywords = {Social sciences, Statistical methods, Statistics}
}
@book{33,
address = {Los Angeles},
edition = {Fifth edition},
series = {Applied social research methods series},
title = {Survey research methods},
isbn = {978-1-4522-5900-0 978-1-4833-1240-8},
publisher = {SAGE},
author = {Fowler, F. J.},
year = {2014},
keywords = {Social surveys}
}

BIN
modal_average.png Normal file

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 25 KiB

BIN
tech_skills.png Normal file

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 50 KiB

BIN
total_skills.png Normal file

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 54 KiB